By
Samuel Taylor Coleridge, 1817
+
For as to the devotees of the circulating libraries, I dare not compliment their
pass-time, or rather
kill-time, with the name of
reading. Call it rather a sort of beggarly day- dreaming, during which the mind of the dreamer furnishes for itself nothing but laziness and a little mawkish sensibility; while the whole materiel and imagery of the doze is supplied ab extra by a sort of mental camera obscura manufactured at the printing office, which pro tempore fixes, reflects and transmits the moving phantasms of one man's delirium, so as to people the barrenness of an hundred other brains afflicted with the same trance or suspension of all common sense and all definite purpose.
We should therefore transfer this species of amusement, (if indeed those can be said to retire
a musis, who were never in their company, or relaxation be attributable to those, whose bows are never bent) from the genus,
reading, to that comprehensive class characterized by the power of reconciling the two contrary yet co-existing propensities of human nature, namely; indulgence of sloth, and hatred of vacancy. In addition to novels and tales of chivalry in prose or rhyme, (by which last I mean neither rhythm nor metre) this genus comprizes as its species, gaming, swinging, or swaying on a chair or gate; spitting over a bridge; smoking; snuff-taking; tete a tete quarrels after dinner between husband and wife; conning word by word all the advertisements of the daily advertizer in a public house on a rainy day...
+
In times of old, books were as religious oracles; as literature advanced, they next became venerable preceptors; they then descended to the rank of instructive friends; and as their numbers increased, they sunk still lower to that of entertaining companions; and at present they seem degraded into culprits to hold up their hands at the bar of every self- elected, yet not the less peremptory, judge, who chuses to write from humour or interest?
The same gradual retrograde movement may be traced, in the relation which the authors themselves have assumed towards their readers… Poets and Philosophers, rendered diffident by their very number, addressed themselves to "learned readers ;" then, aimed to conciliate the graces of "the candid reader ;" till, the critic still rising as the author sunk, the amateurs of literature collectively were erected into a municipality of judges, and addressed as THE TOWN! And now finally, all men being supposed able to read, and all readers able to judge, the multitudinous PUBLIC, shaped into personal unity by the magic of abstraction, sits nominal despot on the throne of criticism.
From
Biographia Literaria ch. 3